A guide to essential founder traits
A guide to essential founder traits
Words Raluca Ciobancan & Sara Foster
October 23rd 2024 / 8 min read
Ask a room of investors what they look for when they are investing in a business, they’ll each offer a range of criteria.
For early stage investors, one common theme is likely—we’re more interested in the founder than the business.
Take this quote from seasoned investor Tom Hulme (GV’s Head of Europe): “At a pre-seed stage…if I have shown interest in your business and your product, then it’s more likely that I’m actually trying to understand how the person sitting opposite me (e.g. the founder) is actually thinking about the problem.”
So what is it exactly that we look for in founders? Over the last seven years, we’ve invested in over 300 companies; over 90 of these have been in our Venture Studio, where we bring founders at the pre-product stage). This gives us a good insight into the traits of successful and influential entrepreneurs, before ideas exist or are fully formed.
Here, we’ve distilled seven traits that we believe make founders venture-backable, with guidance on how we evaluate fit for these characteristics.
Interested in receiving more insights like this ? Subscribe to our newsletter and join 19,000+ founders, investors, and innovators
Subscribe hereHigh risk appetite
TLDR: Comfort with the uncertainties of a startup compared to a traditional career
Founding a business is one massive risk. There’s a chance you could build the next unicorn, but there’s a much higher chance you’ll fail.
If there’s one non-negotiable we look for in a founder, it’s a high risk appetite. Founders need to be comfortable with the unknown, open to failing fast, and have enough conviction to push forward with very little certainty around the outcome. This is why we optimise for either experienced founders, or operators from a high growth startup. Someone who’s gone through the ups and downs of building at this early stage will come in with a clear idea of exactly what it takes and whether now’s a good time in their life to take it on.
Timing plays a key role here as well. We’ve met many excellent founders with a proven risk appetite who simply aren’t ready at that moment in life to jump into that environment again. We need to try and understand whether now is the right time to take the leap for any founder. Are they in a position to sacrifice their salary and job security, in return for the potential upside of starting their own business?
Cat Jones demonstrated a considerable appetite for risk when she founded Byway, a travel business, during COVID. She had an immense conviction in the prospect that, when travel did return to normal, people’s preferences would be more oriented towards sustainable, flight-free travel. It was a real bet on the future of the industry, requiring her to press on full steam ahead while the travel industry ground to a halt. It's a bet which has certainly paid off, seeing the business close £5M in Series A funding in 2024, selling trips across Europe, and successfully delivering on its promise to reduce the carbon impact of travel.
How do we evaluate?
We look into the story behind past role transitions. Have they been more proactive than reactive, have they driven their career and taken risks? We’ll often ask directly why now is the time to put your financial security on the line. There are many convincing answers, but what we need to see generally is a willingness to sacrifice pay for equity (an incentive to drive the company’s success) and to operate without much of a safety cushion.
When optimising for founding experience (whether as a founder or part of a founding team) we’re looking for someone who’s experienced the hard parts, failed, and learned from this. Are they comfortable with the amount of unknowns at this stage, and already thinking about solutions? Can they act decisively in situations without much information? Essentially, do they know what it takes to scale a business and are ready to face that head on?
Authority to build
TLDR: Compelling reason and experience to ‘win’ in a certain space
It happens surprisingly often that we meet an excellent founder, but we’re left wondering—why this venture?
This is a question of founder-market fit. What we’re looking for is that the founder is a credible leader for this particular business, giving them an edge over others in the space. Do they have a deep understanding of the problem, an innate understanding about how the industry works, as well as the right experience in terms of how to approach the problem—what we call a ‘unique insight into the future’?
Storytelling is important. A founder who’s experienced the problem first-hand—whether personally or professionally—is usually more convincing. Whether pitching, selling, or hiring, you need to be able to craft a narrative about your FMF, emphasising your right to win as a founder in this space.
Being opportunistic about a problem space is okay, but really we’re more interested in those founders who are obsessed with the problem they’re trying to solve, either because they’ve been dealing with it for a long time, or have a personal closeness to it. Resilience is essential for an early-stage founder, and obsession helps with resilience. Ultimately, this sense of urgency (that the problem needs solving) is what will push you through the tough times of running a business.
Louise Weiss demonstrated exceptional founder-market fit for Ogma, her startup using AI to transform speech and language therapy for children. Ogma brings together her entrepreneurial experience (as her second business targeting parents and children), with academic and professional background in the industry, having studied a PhD in developmental cognitive neuroscience, as well as eight years working at Great Ormond Street Hospital researching language development in children. Her experience is well complemented by co-founder Cole Robertson, an AI domain expert with a PhD in cognitive psychology and psycholinguistics.
How do we evaluate?
Assessing founder market fit is really about assessing domain expertise. This means more than just first-hand experience in a particular industry. It’s about having spent time exploring that industry, gaining not just first-hand experience of a particular problem but also an understanding on an industry-wide scale. Our ideal founder is someone who’s already been thinking about this space and is going to build a big business with or without us.
This will ultimately lead to a strong network in this space, a grasp on terminology and technicalities, and knowledge of how the system works in that particular industry. All these things act as a heuristic for how quickly a founder can mobilise and get going.
That doesn’t mean, however, that you have to have first-hand experience in a certain industry. We are open to founders with an eye for opportunity—as long as they show the eagerness and aptitude to learn deeply about the problem, particularly through showing empathy for the customer (more on this later).
Coachability
TLDR: Humility about the right path and openness to advice & feedback
While we expect founders to have strong convictions about the business they are building and their approach to building it, they should also be open to being coached about certain decisions they’re going to have to make.
One phrase we use a lot when assessing founders is ‘strong opinions, loosely held’. It’s a principle that encapsulates the balance of conviction and coachability very well. Founders should have well-informed, strong opinions that come from their deep understanding and experience of a problem space. At the same time, they must hold these opinions loosely, ready to pivot or adapt based on new data, insights, or advice. This flexibility is crucial in the fast-paced zero-to-one environment.
A coachable founder is not just open to hearing feedback but actively seeks it out. They understand that feedback is a tool for growth, not a personal critique. This openness creates a culture of continuous improvement and learning within their startup, which lays strong foundations for when the company scales operations. There is a balance to strike between humility and confidence. While the founders we look for need the confidence to lead and make bold decisions, they must also possess the humility to recognise when they don’t have all the answers and be willing to seek guidance.
There are some general, known benefits of a coachable founder—quicker iterations, preference for data driven decision-making, continuous learning mindset, etc.
As a Venture Studio, one of the key advantages we offer is access to a seasoned team, who have built and scaled multiple concepts across different markets, operating models and customer segments. We have a huge amount of collective knowledge, across both success and failure. In any environment, a coachable founder will understand how to leverage an available wealth of knowledge, drawing on diverse perspectives to make better decisions and drive the venture towards success.
How do we evaluate?
We look for coachability throughout the entire interview process but the most telling is at pitch stage. This is where we ask founders to put together a 20 minute pitch for the Studio Investment. We intentionally pick an area of improvement and give them feedback in the Q&A after the pitch. How a person responds to the feedback is a clear sign of level of coachability. Are they dismissive and defensive, or do they get curious, ask follow up questions and take on a brainstorming approach to how the gap might be filled.
Magnetism
TLDR: Ability to attract the best [talent, investors, customers, etc]
Leading a business requires having a certain substance that draws people to you, being able to inspire, excite, and convince people to think ‘whatever this person’s doing, I want to be on board’. We call this magnetism, the way successful founders attract the best talent, investors, partners, and customers.
Storytelling is again a key component. Early stage companies have zero credibility: If they’re really innovative, there may be very few people who believe the idea could work, and otherwise you’re asking people to take a leap of faith. Good storytelling means the founder can paint a clear picture about where the business is today, where it's going, and what critical role you can play in that journey.
Behind good storytelling is a clarity of vision, and a competence in communicating this. Have they clearly thought out and defined the path they’re on, and where they’re going? Is that coherent with their own story—why should people believe them or give them their money and time?
The founding team of DRONAMICS personified magnetism. Their vision—to transform logistics through ultra-efficient, long distance drones—required considerable upfront investment, exceptional talent, and a range of public and private partners that would help them overhaul an industry. Brothers and founders Svilen and Konstantin Rangelov not only told a compelling story, they wagered a considerable bet on their own success: that they wouldn’t shave their beards until their first test flight. It might sound like a gimmick but their vision and ambition, backed up by an unerring confidence in themselves, clearly got people on board. They’ve raised over $75M (including several competitive EIC grants), employ over 100 people, and are poised to start their first commercial flights in the coming months.
How do we evaluate?
You can get a sense for the founder’s ‘magnetism’ at each stage of the hiring process—was the conversation energising and exciting? Were we convinced by the things they said? But the best opportunity to evaluate this will be in the pitch, where storytelling and clear communication is crucial to properly articulate their idea for the business. If they can get us excited about their vision and the idea of working with them, it’s a good indicator of their future ability to do the same with investors, top talent, customers in sales meetings, etc.
Adaptability
TLDR: Ability and willingness to wear many hats
The early stage of a company is a period of constant change, iteration, and experimentation. At the beginning, you’ll have to make many big decisions with very little information. As the business grows, you scale with the business, and change your approach.
To succeed, founders must be extremely attentive to the needs of the business and able to respond to those needs in real time, whether that’s relating to customers, team members, investors, or other stakeholders, all of whom require a slightly different approach.
Louis Warner, partner at G-Force and former COO at Founders Factory, says: “The capacity to recognise, understand and manage their own emotions—whilst recognising, understanding, and influencing the emotions of others—is one of the most important attributes we see in top founders. They can gauge the tone of a conversation well, and adapt their own style and messaging quickly to achieve the best outcome for themselves or their business.”
In the day-to-day, any founder will need to be a wearer of multiple hats, and to excel at this type of context switching. In a broader sense, adaptability means the founder will also need to grow in parallel to the growth of the company. This is a challenge of the ‘Founder & CEO’ role, as the two are quite different roles. We’re looking for someone who can lead a company through its full life cycle, moving from being a scrappy startup founder who does everything, to more of an executive focused on strategy, macro perspective, and leading high-performing teams.
Scan.com's Charlie Bullock describes his own journey as a CEO & co-founder of one of Europe’s fastest growing startups. “My role as CEO has changed a lot. I’m trying to get comfortable with letting go of day-to-day tasks, things like sales or product, which I love, but hiring great people to take on these tasks makes this a lot easier. Really, it ’s about finding areas where I can add maximum value to the overall business. And all too often, this involves finding time to not do anything and just think.”
How do we evaluate?
One ideal founder archetype is the operator who's experienced hypergrowth—scaling from seed to growth in a successful startup. If you’ve seen (and ideally led) the whole lifecycle of a company, odds are you’ve had to make that transition from scrappy early-stage founder to strategic leader and will be better set up to do so again. In our Studio, we’ve recently hired founders who’ve held leadership positions at the likes of Revolut, Monzo, Thriva Health, and Plum.
Deep domain expertise is important, but we’re ultimately after a generalist with a T-shaped skill set, someone who will have a perspective on multiple functions of the business. In the pitch, we’re looking more for an actionable zero-to-one plan than for a big vision. What will they do in the first week, the first month, the first 6 months? Are they open to experimenting, testing, and making changes when necessary?
Ability to find shortcuts
TLDR: Able to find hacks to rapidly accelerate progress
Great entrepreneurs find ways to make systems work in their favour. Faced with roadblocks and limited resources, they discover workarounds to the ‘rules’ or standard way of doing things, allowing them to unlock an unfair advantage wherever and as often as they can. This drive to look for shortcuts is a crucial differentiator. It demonstrates the founder is conscious of their strengths and gaps, prioritises speed, and is inventive with problem solving.
In the face of a challenge we’re looking for those who think how can I make this work rather than of all the ways it won’t. Those who are able to find creative solutions that may not be immediately obvious or available to others. Similarly, there’s a good barometer for when a founder would give up. Within reason, truly resourceful founders never stop, as there are always solutions and options to pivot, or chances to further validate that which hasn’t been tested yet.
Louis Warner says: “Resourceful founders build value at speed. The opposite is characterised by constant excuse making, with every suggestion being met with a reason why it won’t work or how hard it might be.”
HealthKey founder David Jørring showed an immense resourcefulness in the early days of their digital health platform. They were faced with a classic cold start problem—trying to get users on their platform at the same time as trying to build out an offering of digital health products. He made great use of HealthKey’s partnership with Aviva, putting together a plan to run a test with 800 of their employees to better understand how the platform would be utilised to feed in better insights about how to sell in the B2B space. With just 12 health products on the platform, they were able to launch to this small audience, quickly gather insights and qualitative feedback, and turn this into a contract with them.
How do we evaluate?
The best indicator here is looking back at lived experience, and going more broad with the types of answers we’re interested in. Entrepreneurship can be demonstrated anywhere—where has it shown up for this person? Where have they shown creativity to overcome big problems when working with limited resources (i.e. not just throwing a big budget at it)? These skills will be transferable from first time founders all the way to seasoned entrepreneurs.
IQ and EQ Balance
TLDR: Smart, empathetic, people-centred
There’s a certain intelligence that we look for when we invest in founders—something that demonstrates a formidable understanding about a certain problem, and will help them stand out in the space. But this has to be balanced with an emotional intelligence, and in particular an ability to empathise.
Ultimately, understanding a problem from the inside out means putting yourself in the shoes of the person experiencing it. To be a founder you must deeply care about the audience/users you’re building for, able to listen to them and grasp their pain points, giving you the right level of insight to find a solution for their problem.
This ability to empathise of course also applies to team members. Going back to magnetism, founders need to be excellent leaders, someone that people want to work with and succeed for, and this requires a strong sense of empathy, humanity, and self-awareness. Creating a solid company culture is critical in an early stage venture - where the team is in it less for the money and more for the big vision, growth opportunity, potential for real impact, and the chance to work in a dynamic environment with high-calibre people. Great founders are people who play the infinite game, rather than the finite one.
Radical feedback culture is a big part of this. As leaders, founders should not only be able to give empathetic, constructive feedback, they should be actively seeking it themselves, looking for data which helps them grow, improve, and become better versions of themselves.
For a business managing the health of elderly family members abroad, trust is non-negotiable. Nila founder Anthony Jacob grasped the importance of compassion in the company mission, building a founding team who brings the same level of care for that mission as he does. Through empathy for cultural background and personal experience, Anthony and the Nila team have fostered connections to their customer base - Indians living abroad taking care of family back home - through time and effort taken to understand their needs, which continues to pay off in customer testimonials.
How do we evaluate?
When assessing EQ, there are many indicators in the way someone speaks, both about others and about themselves. Looking at the way they talk about people: is investing in their team a number one priority, and have they nurtured talent in the past? Can they put themselves into the shoes of their potential customers, and have examples of doing so?
Regarding self-awareness, we pay attention to how they talk about failure: are they open and reflective, and willing to take responsibility? We may ask questions like “What characteristics would you look for in a co-founder that would compliment your own?” or “Tell me about someone you’ve worked with who you admire, and why?”, which often help paint a better picture of how someone sees themselves and how conscious they are of their own strengths and gaps.
We don’t have enough evidence in front of us to conclusively say what the formula is for founder success. And most likely, it’s because it probably doesn’t exist. Founders should see this list of important traits not as a checklist but rather as a way of mapping your different strengths. No founder will perfectly embody all of these, and nor should they. Founders of all personalities, skills, and backgrounds have tasted success. Moreover, these traits are not binary, and founders shouldn’t despair if they don’t map onto these. Rather, they should be seen as skills: they can be learned, honed, and perfected, something that may take time and experience (of success and failure).
About Raluca
Raluca Ciobancan is Head of Talent Investing at Founders Factory, sourcing and investing in founders to build businesses in our Venture Studio, as well as supporting founders build founding teams in our Accelerator.
About Sara
Sara Foster is Talent & Community Lead at Founders Factory. She helps source and hire founders for our Venture Studios in Berlin and Milan.
News from the Factory Floor
trends
Modern Day Alchemy: Decoupling the material supply chain
What if we could meet demand for rare materials without relying on physical mining?
founder stories
DRIFT Energy founder Ben Medland: On creating a new class of renewable energy
Ben Medland, founder & CEO of DRIFT, describes how their unique combination of hardware and software is creating a groundbreaking opportunity for the energy transition
trends
Beyond Pickaxes & Drills: Transforming mining exploration
Can emerging tools make mineral exploration smarter and more sustainable? We examine the opportunities and challenges in the sector